The Day the Cowboys Quit

Ashley Tran 900 AM History 1301 Lori Lehtola can dark-brown lavatory dark-brown was an abolitionist who had a big hatred over slavery. His feelings of hate were so strong over slavery that it lead him to seize the United States arsenal at Harpers Ferry. John began a broad massacre along the Pottawatomie Creek along the Kansas territory. It exclusively began on the month October and the year of 1859. dark-brown had a insane way of thinking and doing things. Johns great plan was to arm slaves for a future rebellion.He was an anti-slavery firearm and tried to do everything in his power to keep slavery from happening in Kansas, but he was also a murderer. I believe that he told people he was anti-slavery, which he was, but had a feeling inside him that liked taking other peoples lives. The three authors who contributed to the article rough John brown were W. E. B. Du Bois, Robert Penn Warren, and David S. Reynolds. Their respected backgrounds impacted their forecasts of Brow n and his actions. W. E. B. Du Boiss background was greatly respected by Browns article. W. E. B. elieved that because of John Browns actions over slavery, it gave everyone his or her right to freedom. According to Du Bois, all men are equal and are no less than one a nonher. Du Bois stated that slavery is wrong(p) so we must kill it. His opinion is respected by Johns actions because he views it in a way in which that what John Brown did was right. He earned us our freedom. If it werent for what Brown did, we wouldnt have our freedom. W. E. B. was one of the most influential African American intellectuals of the 20th century. He compete a founding role in the NAACP, which was a path breaking civilization.Because of how Du Bois viewed John Browns actions and how he strongly believed that what he did round slavery was right would be an impact on wherefore he got involved with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Robert Penn Warren believes that even thou gh John Brown had such an enormous religious faith, God was not on neither sides of John Brown nor the South. What Brown did was abnormal and not Godly, according to Warren. Roberts background has impacted his view on John Brown in a way that he believed Brown was responsible for his criminal- like actions.He believes that what Brown did to the proslavery was not based on God. Meaning, it wasnt a God based decision, it was more of a Godly assuage he used towards his criminal actions. Robert mainly focused on themes of Southern culture and history. His personal taking into custody of John Browns actions has greatly impacted his history about the south and his knowledge about its history of culture. David S. Reynolds wonders how John Brown could spare murder with such a religious faith. David stated that Brown used violence in order to create a monastic order devoid of slavery and racism. He believed that John Brown didnt just do it for slavery, but did it because his goal was a de mocratic night club race, religion, and gender didnt even matter. David has his particular opinion about Browns actions because he notion that what Brown did to these proslavery people wasnt for the reason he said for doing so. Reynolds background has impacted his view on John Brown and his actions because he can inform others about his opinion on Browns actions. His opinion reflects a twenty-first century on Brown informed by the kinsfolk 11, 2001, terrorists attacks on the United States. Basically, he thought of John as more of a terrorist than a gunslinger of slavery. W. E. B. Du Bois, Robert Penn Warren, and David S. Reynolds were all impacted in different ways by John Browns actions. Their own particular opinions were based on how they viewed John Browns actions. Johns huge massacre at Pottawatomie Creek was his psychotic way of handling things. He was a murderer of proslavery and his condone was God. These three authors who contributed to John Browns article were interest ed in African American society or Southern history. Their view on John Browns history has impacted their own.