Progressivism Misery of the Masses

Progressivism - misfortune of the Masses\n\n[i:7a88bc7b81]Question: How did constructives redefine scantiness? Why was that important? Where and wherefore did progressive solutions for the problems of pauperization slide by short?\n\nIf there was hotshot period of American narrative that could be labeled the close to influential or constructive to the reality of our society today, possibly it would be the Progressive try. A reason may be progressives were not against the American system, they equitable wanted to fix it. They believed potently in the good of humanity, fairness, and regulation. truly conservatives at heart, they wanted to backtrack back to the days of equality of opportunity, democracy, and social justice. Equality, fairness, opportunity every(prenominal) predominately applied to the poor lousinessce they were just about standardisedly the ones being taken advantage of. In vague of privation progressives, however, had a untold different view tha n the sin of the individual. Poverty, in their eyes, was airly think to the environment and opportunities an individual was presented with. This mindset was important because it was at the root of any the reforms progressives lobbied for. However reverend and good-hearted the efforts of progressives were to eliminate poverty, they were accompany with mis-education and poor treatments.\n\nThe Progressive views of poverty are fairly elemental: poverty is the product of failures of the government activity and the environment it creates. Driven by social justice, people like Jacob Riis showed the grim reality of poverty to the rest of the world. In this incident case, he used photographs to strongly illustrate the effects from abuses of an industrial society. Riis and others like Jane Addams, Theodore Dreiser, and Frank Norris all took up the cause for the barren and created sympathy for the less fortunate. The mass of progressives steered away from the issue of self-importan ce sin that brought about roughly of the evils of society they were fighting against: alcoholism, corruption, prostitution, and medicine abuse. This again fuses the idea that the aliveness of the poor was a direct product of the environment in which they lived.\n\nBecause of the secular way progressives looked at the poor, they used unorthodox and modernistic methods rather than the evangelical meaning of the past great awakenings. The progress of social service travel from the settlement house movement to the social worker which was affiliated full...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.