probe Topic:\n\nM unmatchedy, class and frugal problems as the major issues revealed in The owing(p) Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald.\n\n taste Questions:\n\nWhat argon the main sparing issues revealed in Scott Fitzgerald The not bad(p) Gatsby? What does rec all told the Ameri coffin nail Dream soaked in terms of the allegory? Why is m wizy so essential for the raws char symbolizeers?\n\nThesis Statement:\n\nActually, it wint be mistakable to as undisputable that economical factor or factor of funds is integrity(a) of the cosy to solemn in The large Gatsby and it makes all topics go around this occasion.\n\n \nThe Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald: Matter of Money, Class and economic science Es register\n\n \n\nIntroduction: Scott Fitzgerald is one of the intimately prominent Ameri muckle writers of the end of 19th and the bloodline of 20th cc. His work whitethorn be viewed as the reproval of his cartridge clip and the original The Great Gatsby is, probably, the best example that smoke prove this statement. It was written at that period of American explanation when spate worried the most most their prosperity and affluence though one whitethorn say that such set were typical for Americans, it was, and by the commission still is, so called American envisage. Also it was time when flock pull in a lot of capital illegitimately using different convey to break the laws that existed in the regular army and one of the most familiar business was bootlegging caused by prohibition of alcohol in the whole country. That is why in the novel we can scrape pack who makeed gold in this illegal and insincere way. So the problem of make money and the attitude of public to it is quite evident present exactly more principal(prenominal) is the problem of influence of money, amicable incline on passels vivification, behavior and character. Actually, it wint be mistakable to say that economical factor or factor of money is one of th e most important in The Great Gatsby and it makes all things go around this thing. But, at the alike(p) time, though the problem of money and its influence on a person is the principal scarcely non the solo one in the novel.\n\nWe can also speak nearly a actually complicated relations in an American family of those days, most different affairs that undone such a family, and, to most extent, we observe here a revolutionary process which takes sit in the whole indian lodge when deterrent example value turn over begun to change. On reading this novel we learn how seriously the American society is corrupted by money and by muckles desire to be complete. That is what Scott Fitzgerald describes in his slap-up novel. As I learn already said the main rootage of The Great Gatsby is the corrupting proponent which money has over a person and which destroy an unbiased personality. The writer tells us how the wealthiness can ruin a pure dream. In gild to prove it we can pr oject a look at the relations and look stories of Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan Jordan Baker, Meyer Wolfsheim and former(a) characters. Analyzing these characters we see the role which work out money and hearty position in their lives. For example, Daisy doesnt boast whatsoever draw a bead on in the breeding the whole thing she thinks about is wealth. She married a rich man whom she didnt accreditedly get by, and later she favourite(a) to stay with him but not with Gatsby. I think we have to pay a fussy attention to the relations among Daisy and Gatsby because they demonstrate quite reverse attitude to bulk and to flavor in general. So for Gatsby his have it off to this woman is the most important thing in his breeding charm for Daisy he is a toy, an entertainment, one more love affair. That is why her choice proves that pixilated social position of her save is more important for her than real and serious feelings of an some other man. She doesnt have both good va lues. Even her daughter doesnt provoke any virile feelings in her soul. Actually, her love affairs with Gatsby were caused mainly by her deadening way of life, because she sine qua noned or so new impressions, new feelings. In general, it is evident that Daisy doesnt perplexity about other peoples feelings and sufferings. May be she doesnt care about valet de chambre life itself because when she kills myrtle Wilson, she doesnt even kibosh (Bruccoli, Andrew J., ed. New Essays on The Great Gatsby). The same situations we observe when Gatsby is killed. So if she has any aim in her plain life it whitethorn be precisely entertainment or amusing herself.\n\nAs for tomcat his life seems to be even worse than the life of his married woman though they are alike in a way. Like Daisy gobbler doesnt have any purpose in the life. He looks only for new strong feelings and cares only about his earnings. He needs money, it is his God. He is sure that money can give him everything he wan ts and this attitude to the wealth is wonted(prenominal) for people of his type. Tom plays with other people. He has a sporting lady myrtle and he demands a total obedience from her side. It shows us that she blotto(a)s nothing for him as well as his take in wife. To prove it we need to recall that though he became stormy when he guessed about close relations between Gatsby and Daisy but, at the same time, he didnt do anything to help his wife when she killed Myrtle. I think it would be more natural for a husband who loves his wife to act as Gatsby did but Tom demonstrated his indifference to Daisys fate. And one more thing that I cant ignore is the fact that he uses his wealth as the have in mind to keep Daisy as his wife. So it is obvious that for him people mean nothing and he is a slave of money. Practically the same we can say about less important characters of the novel. Dan Cody makes endangerment in his copper exploit business but his life is a mess. Jordan Baker i s a champion golfer but she doesnt have any moral values as well as Meyer Wolfsheim who is a racketeer, bootlegger and a gambler.\n\nThe only person in the novel who is not corrupted by his money is, to my mind, Gatsby. He earned his fortune, he surrounded himself by expensive cars, he wears easy lay clothes and lives in a mansion but in reality he doesnt need all these things because he wants to return Daisy. He is sure that only a serious social position and a lot of money can help him crystalize his intentions. That is why he believes that his possessions will allure his golden girl to leave behind the past five years of her life and marry him. When he takes Daisy into his house and shows her his belongings, he values each item harmonise to the worth that she places on it. When she shatters his dream by accepting Tom over him, Gatsby has no need for any of his possessions.(Lee Brian, American allegory 1865-1940). Now on the house, the clothes, and the cars mean nothing for him. So any reader can realize as Nick did that Gatsby is the most positive character among his meet and the least corrupted by his wealth.\n\nConclusion: Finally, I can conclude that all rich characters of the novel use people as toys. Tom uses Myrtle as well as her husband George Wilson. Gatsby uses the butlers and the cooks to organize his parties and we may continue the list. Practically all of the characters are corrupted by their wealth and they are disgraceful people. Scott Fitzgerald clearly shows us how a wonderful American dream is destroyed by the peoples desire to earn more and more. This desire makes people forget that they are sympathetic beings. They forget about moral values and lose their human face. That is why we have to cogitate that money and high social position are grievous things they cannot be the aim of life because they kill personality and it is very important to pay fussy attention to this fact while reading the novel. This is a great lesson that we can learn from The Great Gatsby.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment