Wednesday, October 2, 2019
Intertial Confinement Fusion Essay -- Nuclear
Missing Figures    INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION      1. Introduction / Beginnings    In the 1940s during the development of nuclear explosives, the  inertial confinement approach to fusion was born. Weapons  researchers determined that by use of high energy sources, such as the  fission reaction, light nuclei could be fused, thus creating intense fusion  energy. Scientists in the controlled fusion camp also realized that tight  compression of fuel pellets could increase the fusion reaction rate  which is proportional to fuel density. (Robert A. Gross, Fusion  Energy, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 295)    Scientists were, at this stage, trying to discover a mechanism which  could compress a light-nucleus fuel. The invention of high power lasers  encouraged the inertial-confinement camp. The radiation from the  laser heats a fuel pellet, and as the plasma from the pellet rapidly expands,  a momentum reaction sends compressive waves inward,  converging on the pellet's core. The energy in the core causes the ignition  of the pellet. The common desire is to obtain a thermonuclear  energy yield that exceeds the energy which is required  to heat and compress the solid before the pellet explodes;  hence the name inertial confinement. Some of the early research in this  subject was done by Nuckolls and Kidder of the Livermore Laboratory,  and Bosov and Krokhin of the Kurchatov Institute in the  USSR. (Gross, 295)    Since these great efforts, the scientific community has considered  inertial-confinement fusion to be the top alternate method for controlled  thermonuclear fusion. The most probable containment, of  course, is magnetic confinement fusion. Tokamak Fusion Test  Reactor (TFTR) in Princeton, New Jersey is argueably the premier  ma...              ...died; however, the heavy-ion accelerators show much promise in its  short time of consideration. Laser light coupling and laser efficiencies have  been a problem for laser-driven designs. Ion-driven devices  have problems of their own, particularly in focusing to the required power  density. (Dean, 75) The HYBALL-II project as well as other ICF  projects today have easily surpassed the yields of the early ICF  reactors (SOLASE). In the big picture, however, one should keep in mind  that magnetic-confinement devices show much more promise at  this point.      Works Cited    Dean, Stephen O., (ed.). Prospects for Fusion Power. New York: Pergamon    Press, 1981.    Gross, Robert A. Fusion Energy. New York: John Wiley and Sons,    1984.    Velarde, Guillermo, et. al, (ed.). Nuclear Fusion by Inertial Confinement:    A Comprehensive Treatise. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993.                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment